Illustrative scenario

Three plants, one unit of production, one outlier

Illustrative scenario — representative of common industrial IoT applications

Energy & electricityManufacturing — automotive, plastics & rubber

Same product, same equipment — one plant used about 40% more energy per unit.

A three-plant manufacturer

No client is named, no logo is shown and no figure here was measured at any site (R2).

How it went.

Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.

  1. 01

    Alert

    Three plants making the same product reported three different energy bills, and nobody could say whether the difference was production volume or waste.

  2. 02

    Cost

    ~40% more energy per unit — Plant 2 vs. the two comparable sites, normalized to production.

  3. 03

    Fix

    Identical metering points at each site · Production-count input for normalization · A shared cross-site dashboard view

  4. 04

    Restored

    One normalized number that ranks the sites

In full.

Illustrative scenario — representative of common industrial IoT applications.

The problem

Three plants making the same product reported three different energy bills, and nobody could say whether the difference was production volume or waste.

What would be installed

  • Identical metering points at each site
  • Production-count input for normalization
  • A shared cross-site dashboard view

What changes

Before — Three bills that could not be compared After — One normalized number that ranks the sites

The number

~40% more energy per unit — Plant 2 vs. the two comparable sites, normalized to production. Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured. [TOM-REVIEW]

In one line

Benchmarking only works when the denominator is real. Metering supplies the denominator.

What the data looked like.

Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.

Three plants, one unit of production, one outlier
FLEET BESTREVIEWPlant 1: 214 kWh/tPlant 2: 299 kWh/tPlant 3: 221 kWh/t214299221
ENERGY PER UNIT OF PRODUCTION · BY SITE · MONTHLY
Chart data
IntervalEnergy intensity (kWh/t)
Plant 1214
Plant 2299
Plant 3221
Before and after, in words
BeforeThree bills that could not be compared
AfterOne normalized number that ranks the sites

Illustrative dataset — a representative operational profile, seeded and deterministic, not measured at any site.

What changed.

Before

Three bills that could not be compared

After

One normalized number that ranks the sites

~40%

more energy per unit

Plant 2 vs. the two comparable sites, normalized to production.

Source: Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured. [TOM-REVIEW]

Find out what’s hiding in your plant.

Half a day on your floor, no charge and no obligation. At the end of it we tell you what we saw, what we would meter first, and what the return looks like.

Your first opportunity assessment is free.

Book a free consultationAll case studies

or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)